Skip to content
XXIV Old Buildings - Leading Commercial / Chancery Barristers
+44 (0)20 7691 2424
james.fennemore@xxiv.co.uk
Contact Clerks
Add to portfolio
Download CV (PDF)
Download vCard

James has a broad commercial and private wealth disputes practice. His work encompasses civil fraud, trusts, commercial and company disputes, banking and financial services, art and cultural property, and contentious probate and estates.

James is recommended as a leading junior in the legal directories, in which he is identified as “everything you’d want in a junior barrister” and “very much one to watch”. Described as “fantastically clever and hard-working” he is “able to come up with brilliant solutions”, and “knows how to deliver his advice in a manner which is practical, commercial, and readily understandable to clients”.

He acts for an extremely wide range of clients, including individuals, businesses, and office-holders from all over the world. He is experienced in acting as sole counsel in cases across his areas of specialism, and regularly appears in court, both at interim hearings and at trial.  He also very frequently acts as part of a larger team in substantial and complex disputes. Many of his cases involve working with lawyers and clients from other jurisdictions. He has particular recent experience of disputes taking place in Guernsey, Jersey, the Bahamas, Bermuda, Hong Kong, and Gibraltar.

Expertise

James has rapidly developed a specialism in art and cultural property matters. He is ranked as a leading junior in this practice area in both Chambers and Partners and the Legal 500, where he is described as “extremely bright and knowledgeable on the law” and “very practical in his advice…excellent at distilling complex legal concepts into a readily understandable form”.

Notable cases include:

  • Winehouse v Parry and Gourlay: acting for the estate of Amy Winehouse in an ownership dispute in the High Court following the auction of numerous culturally-significant items formerly belonging to the late singer-songwriter.
  • Acting in the High Court for an art dealership seeking rescission and damages against an internationally acclaimed fine-art photographer on the basis of fraudulent misrepresentations and dishonest auction practices.
  • Acting for the owner of a very valuable sculpture be a renowned artist (worth c. £4 million) in a dispute concerning the terms on which the sculpture could be resold.
  • Hutchcroft v Barrett: acting for the owner of a substantial collection of valuable couture in a dispute concerning the nature of payments totalling c £1.4 million made by a dress agency in Kensington (led by Edward Cumming KC).
  • Hindle v Kitching: acting in a case in the Guernsey Royal Court and Court of Appeal concerning the disputed ownership of a vintage Jaguar sports car (assisting Advocate Alison Ozanne)

James has experience acting for investors, finance professionals, and regulated entities in disputes concerning financial services.

His experience includes claims brought under sections 90 and 90A of FSMA, mis-selling claims, claims concerning alleged negligent investment advice, and cases requiring detailed consideration of the COBS rules and FSMA regime.

Notable cases include:

  • G I Globinvestment Limited & ors v XY ERS UK Limited & ors: acting in a 7-week Commercial Court trial for the (successful) principal defendants, including an FCA-regulated firm, defending substantial claims for misrepresentation, negligence, and under section 138D FSMA in relation to investments made by UHNW clients in compartments of a Luxembourg investment fund which were liquidated at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic (led by Adam Cloherty KC).
  • Various Investors v BT Group Plc: acting for a group of institutional investors in a claim brought under section 90A of FSMA, arising from allegations that BT misled the market in relation to fraudulent accounting practices in its Italian subsidiary (led by Edward Cumming KC).
  • Various Investors v Petrofac Limited: acting for a group of investors in a claim brought under section 90A of FSMA, concerning allegations that Petrofac misled the market in relation to contracts for oil and gas projects secured by bribery in the Middle East (led by Edward Cumming KC).

James is identified as a leading junior for civil fraud in Chambers and Partners, where he is described as “detail-oriented, responsive and everything you’d want in a junior”.  He has a wide range of experience of civil fraud and asset tracing cases, from the early stages of proceedings (including freezing and proprietary injunctions) through to trial.

Notable cases include:

  • G I Globinvestment Limited & ors v XY ERS UK Limited & ors: acting in a 7-week Commercial Court trial for the (successful) principal defendants in a wide-ranging fraud and conspiracy claim.  The claimants brought proceedings for fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, dishonest assistance and unlawful means conspiracy concerning losses suffered in respect of compartments of a Luxembourg investment fund which were liquidated at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic (led by Adam Cloherty KC).
  • Mitchell & ors v Al Jaber & ors: acting in proceedings for equitable compensation for knowing receipt concerning the void transfer of shares owned by a company following its liquidation. The Court of Appeal judgment appears at [2024] EWCA Civ 423, and an appeal concerning the proper approach to the quantification of equitable compensation is before the Supreme Court in 2025.
  • Adams & ors v FS Capital Limited & ors: acting in a trial and in the Court of Appeal on behalf of c.700 beneficiaries of 3 Jersey-law trusts, who successfully recovered debt assets with a book value of over £410m. The court held that the sale of the assets by the trustee had been a fraud on the power, and that the recipient was not a bona fide purchaser for value of the assets and was therefore liable to restore the assets to the trusts and personally liable as a knowing recipient (led by Hugh Miall).
  • Fonds Rusnano Capital SA v CRGF GP Ltd: acting in a trial in the Guernsey Royal Court, in which the plaintiff sought the rescission of a limited partnership agreement said to be worth $125 million on grounds including fraudulent misrepresentation (with Edward Cumming KC, assisting Advocate Sarah Brehaut).
  • Newcastle Investors Freehold Limited v HSBC: acting for a company that had been victim to an authorised push-payment fraud.

James acts in a very wide range of commercial disputes.  As well as advising and acting in contractual disputes of all shapes and sizes in a wide variety of sectors, James is very frequently instructed on cases which overlap with other areas of his commercial chancery practice, including cases involving issues of company law, fiduciary duties, fraud, and insolvency.

James is recommended as a leading junior for commercial disputes in the Legal 500 (Offshore), where he is described as “very responsive…spots issues and potential pitfalls before they are even on the horizon”.

Notable cases include:

  • G I Globinvestment Limited & ors v XY ERS UK Limited & ors: acting in a 7-week Commercial Court trial for the (successful) principal defendants, including an FCA-regulated firm, defending substantial claims for misrepresentation, negligence, and under section 138D FSMA in relation to investments made by UHNW clients in compartments of a Luxembourg investment fund which were liquidated at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic (led by Adam Cloherty KC).
  • Marsden & anor v Oval Holdco Ltd: acting in a High Court dispute arising our of the sale of a telecommunications company (led by Daniel Warents).
  • B&J Investments limited & ors v IQ EQ Trustees (Guernsey) Limited: acting for IQ EQ in a claim arising from alleged breaches of an alleged joint venture agreement concerning the development of a hotel business near Stonehenge (led by Ian Clarke KC)
  • JSC Uzhuralzoloto Group of Companies v Petropavlovsk Plc & ors: acting in High Court proceedings for injunctive relief to prevent the sale of a shareholding in an iron ore mining company by Petropavlovsk Plc (led by Aidan Casey KC and Daniel Warents).

James regularly acts in disputes involving issues of company and partnership law. His experience includes claims for breaches of directors’ duties, derivative claims, unfair prejudice petitions, and winding up petitions on the just and equitable ground. He also very frequently acts in cases concerning companies that form part of trust structures.

Notable cases include:

  • Acting in respect of a double-derivative claim arising from alleged breaches of directors’ duties under Part 10 of the Companies Act 2006.
  • JSC Uzhuralzoloto Group of Companies v Petropavlovsk Plc & ors: acting in High Court proceedings for injunctive relief to prevent the sale of a shareholding in an iron ore mining company by Petropavlovsk Plc (led by Aidan Casey KC and Daniel Warents).
  • Re X: acting in a dispute concerning the governance and control of a prominent Hong Kong manufacturing company.

James has experience in both the High Court and County Court in both corporate and personal insolvency proceedings. He acts for petitioners, debtors, and supporting creditors on bankruptcy and winding up petitions and at other related insolvency hearings, including applications to set aside statutory demands and applications for injunctions to restrain the presentation of a winding up petition.

James also advises and acts in insolvency proceedings and disputes arising under the Insolvency Act 1986 in the course of a bankruptcy or liquidation, including, for example, in respect of void dispositions of property under section 127 of the Act, the antecedent transaction provisions at sections 238-245 of the Act, and claims under section 423 of the Act for transactions defrauding creditors.

James is experienced acting across his practice areas supporting local counsel in legal proceedings taking place in other jurisdictions, including Guernsey, Jersey, the Bahamas, Bermuda, Hong Kong and Gibraltar.  A substantial proportion of his cases involve proceedings abroad (often in more than one jurisdiction).  He also has experience litigating conflicts of law issues, including jurisdiction and service disputes and anti-suit injunctions; as well as dealing with issues of foreign law in English proceedings (including experience cross-examining foreign-law expert witnesses).

James is recognised as a leading junior for disputes concerning trusts and estates in Chambers and Partners UK Bar, Chambers and Partners HNW, and the Legal 500, in which he is described as “extremely user-friendly and consistently brilliant”, “a star in the making…very intelligent and able to come up with brilliant solutions”, “very sensible and pragmatic” and “one of the brightest lawyers that I have worked with”.

James’s trusts experience spans claims for the removal of trustees; claims for breach of trust; applications for accounts and the provision of trust information; claims under Part 64 (and its equivalent in foreign jurisdictions) in respect of the administration of trusts, including Beddoe applications; disputes concerning trusts of land; proprietary estoppel claims; rescission and rectification claims.

James’s probate and estates experience encompasses contentious probate actions, involving allegations of undue influence, want of knowledge and approval, lack of testamentary capacity, and defective execution; claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975; and claims for the removal of personal representatives.

Notable cases include:

  • Adams & ors v FS Capital Limited & ors: acting at trial in the High Court and in the Court of Appeal on behalf of c.700 beneficiaries of 3 Jersey-law trusts, who successfully recovered debt assets with a book value of over £410m. The case involves a substantial number of significant trusts issues, including the effect of a trust’s cash-flow insolvency on the trustee’s duties to creditors and beneficiaries; the circumstances in which a retiring trustee will be liable for the breaches of trust of its successor (a point James argued in the Court of Appeal); and the consequences of a power being exercised for an improper purpose (led by Hugh Miall).
  • Hamersmith-Stewart v Cromwell Trust Company Ltd & ors: acting for one of the beneficiaries of Bahamian trusts that own (inter alia) the Sandals hotel business in a dispute concerning the administration of the trusts (led by David Brownbill KC).
  • In the matter of a Bahamian Trust: acting in a dispute concerning the identity of the protector of a Bahamian trust holding substantial assets in Hong Kong in circumstances where the mental capacity of the settlor and former protector is contested (led by Jonathan Adkin KC).
  • Hine & anor v Bruce-Smith & ors: acting for the defendant former personal administrators of the estate of Lord Jacobs (the late businessman and peer) in a professional negligence claim concerning payments made from sums standing nominally to the credit of Lord Jacobs to defray the inheritance tax liabilities of his late wife, Lady Jacobs (led by Edward Cumming KC).
  • Goodrich v AB: acting for the representative of the class of beneficiaries comprising authors and illustrators in this Public Trustee v Cooper application concerning the distribution of the proceeds of sale of the famous publishing company, Walker Books Limited.
  • Potter v Ntamianova & ors: acting  for the claimants in contentious probate proceedings after an elderly testator had purportedly changed her will to leave substantial assets to a professional carer.  The claim, which settled at an early stage of proceedings, was brought on the footing of (i) lack of testamentary capacity, (ii) want of knowledge and approval and (iii) undue influence (led by Constance McDonnell KC).
  • Mayhew v Dawood: acting for the defendants to a 1975 Act claim brought by a claimant who was shortly to marry the Deceased before her death.
  • Semernina v D’Aponte: acting for the respondent executor and will trustee in an application for pre-action disclosure brought by the respondent’s sister in respect of a threatened claim for his removal (led by Tracey Angus KC).
  • Parks v Parks & another: James obtained summary judgment (both at first instance and on appeal before HHJ Venn) against an adult child claimant under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, on the basis that there was no real prospect of establishing that the deceased’s will had not made reasonable financial provision for the claimant.
  • Molard International (PTC) Limited & another v Rusnano Capital AG (in liquidation):  acting for a company in the Rusnano technology investment group which sought the termination of a trust of which it was the sole beneficiary, in circumstances where the trust deed contained a power to add beneficiaries.  The Guernsey Court of Appeal decision is the leading authority on a beneficiary’s ability to terminate a Guernsey trust under section 53 of the Trusts (Guernsey) Law 2007 (led by Edward Cumming KC and assisting Advocate Rupert Morris).

 

Recommendations

Art and Cultural Property Law

Chambers and Partners

‘James is good in conference and has good people skills. He boils complicated law down and deciphers it for clients to understand so they know what we are trying to achieve.’ ‘Not only does he have a great legal mind and attention to detail, he is also very practical in his advice. He is excellent at distilling complex legal concepts into a readily understandable form.’‘James was always on hand to provide advice and assistance both to the client and to us as instructing solicitors.’ (2025)

Read more

Legal 500

‘James is extremely bright and knowledgeable on the law but also knows how to deliver his advice in a manner which is practical, commercial and readily understandable to clients.’ (2025)

‘Very much one to watch.’ ‘Hugely clever, hugely personable, and brilliant at presenting a case in a way that a judge can easily grasp and be persuaded by.’ (2023)

Private Client: Trust and Probate

Legal 500

‘James is a star in the making. He is very intelligent and able to come up with brilliant solutions.’ (2025)

Ranked as a rising star in (2024).

Chancery: Traditional

Chambers and Partners

‘James is fantastically clever and hard-working. I really enjoy working with him across the spectrum of cases.’ ‘He is one of the brightest lawyers that I have worked with. He produces really excellent written advocacy and is very sensible and pragmatic.’ ‘He is one of the up-and-coming barristers at the set. He is incredibly clever and is able to pick up complicated matters very quickly. A star of the future.’ (2025)

‘Personable and professional, James has excellent legal knowledge and a good manner with clients.’  (2024)

“Excellent legal knowledge and manner with clients” (Chambers High Net Worth 2023)

Offshore

Legal 500

‘James has a great attention to detail and impresses with his detailed knowledge of a case. His advice is always clear and to the point.’ (2025)

Fraud: Civil – London (Bar)

Chambers and Partners

‘James is a very good drafter and very analytical.’ ‘James is detail-oriented, responsive and everything you’d want in a junior.’ ‘He is very clear and concise. He has an otherworldly cleverness and eye for detail.’  (2025)

+44 (0)20 7691 2424
james.fennemore@xxiv.co.uk
Contact Clerks
Add to portfolio
Download CV (PDF)
Download vCard
  • ‘Green Revolution’? Solicitors’ duties in the light of risks relating to climate change [2025] 40-1 JIBFL (co-authored with Edward Cumming KC)
  • Court of Appeal holds that sale of loan assets from insolvent trusts was void as an improper exercise of a fiduciary power (FS Capital Ltd v Adams) [2025] LexisNexis
  • BA English Language and Literature (First Class, top 5 in university) – Brasenose College, University of Oxford
  • MSt English 1550-1700 (Distinction) – Lincoln College, University of Oxford
  • Graduate Dip. Law (Distinction) – Oxford Brookes University
  • ChBA (The Chancery Bar Association)
  • COMBAR (The Commercial Bar Association)
  • Young Fraud Lawyers Association
  • Panel member, Advocate (formerly the Bar Pro Bono Unit)
  • Lord Mansfield Scholarship (Lincoln’s Inn’s top award, 2016)
  • Winner, ESU-Essex Court National Mooting Competition (2016)
  • Lord Brougham Scholarship (Lincoln’s Inn, 2015)
  • Hardwicke Award (Lincoln’s Inn, 2015)
  • Sloane Robinson Graduate Scholarship (Lincoln College, Oxford, 2014)

Business Details


VAT number:
329347386
Registered name:
James David Haigh Fennemore

Portfolio Builder

Select the legal expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)