Skip to content
XXIV Old Buildings - Leading Commercial / Chancery Barristers
+44 (0)20 7691 2424
harry.samuels@xxiv.co.uk
Contact clerks
Download vCard
LinkedIn

Harry is a specialist in commercial and chancery litigation. Ranked in the directories for traditional chancery, private wealth and probate, commercial disputes, company law and insolvency work, he is described variously as “a brilliant advocate”, “a star” a “go-to at the junior end”, and “very talented”. He was the first barrister of his call to be listed in Chambers High Net Worth (2025), and is the only commercial chancery barrister of his call to be ranked in four separate practice areas in the Legal 500 (2027).

With extensive experience of trial advocacy, interim applications and appeals both onshore and offshore, Harry is well-equipped to handle the most complex and high-value litigation whether led or unled. The legal directories praise him for “having the ear of the judge”, being “extremely strategic and very clear in his advice” and “constructing very persuasive arguments which he delivers very tenaciously”, with his written advice and drafting also being described as “of a very high standard”. Other reviewers say that “clients love Harry”, that “his advocacy skills are above the level of his call”, that he “has a level of authority that belies his call”, and that he is “very clever, strategic, hands-on, and an asset to any team.”

Before coming to the Bar, Harry won multiple prizes at undergraduate and postgraduate level, and received Gray’s Inn’s top merit-based scholarships for all three of the GDL, Bar Course and pupillage years. Harry is now a By-Fellow in Law at Hughes Hall, University of Cambridge, where, in addition to his practice, Harry has taught private law papers — including company, land and equity — for several years.

Read more

Harry has also been appointed to the Attorney General’s C Panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown. His work in that capacity has included advising on and acting in relation to the disqualification of directors, and advising on complex points of commercial and trusts law.

Some of Harry’s most significant recent cases include:

  • Voltaire Capital Holdings Limited v Watson & Ors: Acting (led by Hugh Miall KC) for two of the defendants to this US$100m civil fraud claim concerning the affairs of an FX company, spanning allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation, unlawful means conspiracy and breach of fiduciary duty. Harry recently appeared unled at an interim hearing against five silks.
  • Durnont Enterprises Limited v Fazita Investment Limited & Ors [2026] EWHC 405 (Ch), [2026] EWHC 1224 (Ch): Acting for two defendants to this multi-jurisdictional derivative claim said to be worth EUR€100m. The claim relates to a Cypriot company and its principal assets, the bearer certificates in a Polish investment fund. The Claimants allege that the Defendants defrauded it of those certificates.
  • FMA v BBA [2026] EWHC 995 (Ch): Acting (led by Timothy Sherwin) for one of the trustees of a c. £20m family settlement in complex, bitterly-contested High Court proceedings for the removal of the defendant trustee. The case dealt with issues relating to the escheat of English real property, allegations of breach of trust, the rule in Saunders v Vautier, and costs.
  • Re K Trust: Acting (as sole counsel) for a beneficiary advancing claims of gross negligence against the trustee of a Jersey discretionary trust in the Royal Court of Guernsey. The claim related to a negligent failure to invest trust assets properly, and engaged complex questions of the law of gross negligence in Jersey, and the operation of Jersey law prescription periods.
  • Petronas South Caucasus SARL & Anor v Therium Group Holdings Limited & Ors: Acting (with Advocate Turnbull and led by Daniel Warents) for two defendants to an unlawful means conspiracy claim in the Royal Court of Jersey. The claim arises out of a c. US$15bn arbitral award made against the State of Malaysia, and engages complex issues of Spanish law, judicial proceedings immunity, the double actionability rule, and issues of forum non conveniens within jurisdiction challenges.
  • Vatistas v Betta Oceanway Company [2025] EWCA Civ 595: Acting (led by Steven Reed) for the Claimant in a complex, multi-jurisdictional debt claim worth in the region of USD $50m. The case involves significant allegations of fraud and a complex underlying shareholder dispute. Harry also appeared in the Court of Appeal in this case, dealing with whether a minority shareholder alleging fraud should be joined as a defendant to advance his allegations within the proceedings.

Expertise

Harry has a burgeoning practice in art and media law, with experience in fine art, digital media, and claims relating to publications. His experience includes:

  • Advising a multi-billion dollar global media and entertainment company on English law points arising in an appeal from a claim to recover licence fees. The claim is against a licensee broadcaster in a European country.
  • Acting for the defendant to a claim involving the investment in and sale of a painting by a world-renowned artist. The claim touched on issues of ownership, civil fraud and asset recovery.
  • Advising a claimant on remedies available in respect of a forged artwork, including seeking rescission and damages against an auction house, a gallery, and an agent.
  • Pattinson v Winsor [2024] EWHC 1910 (KB): Acting for the claimant in a harassment by publication claim. The claim dealt with defamation and media law principles, including consideration of the Human Rights Act 1998. Harry also appeared, unled, in the Court of Appeal in relation to subsequent contempt proceedings (Pattinson v Winsor [2025] EWCA Civ 344) and in earlier injunctive proceedings (Pattinson v Winsor [2024] EWHC 420 (KB)).

Harry has a wide range of experience of aviation disputes, including:

  • Acting in a seven-figure dispute concerning liquidated damages for delay arising from an aircraft ‘passenger to freight’ conversion agreement.
  • Qatar Airways QCSC v Airbus SAS: Advising the claimant airline on issues of disclosure and privilege in a multi-million pound claim relating to damage to aircraft.
  • Aircraft Services BVBA v Helispares Limited: Acting before the High Court for an aircraft repairs company in relation to a faulty gearbox and damages occasioned by the resultant grounding of the aircraft.
  • Advising a defendant airline about the assignment of claims under the Montreal Convention.
  • Acting for an airline defending a claim under EU Regulation 261/2004 for flight delay.
  • Acting for an airline bringing contractual claims against disruptive passengers.

Harry is developing a strong practice in banking and financial services litigation, acting both as sole counsel and as a junior on numerous multi-million pound claims. He has experience of:

  • Ocean Freight Offshore Master Fund Limited v Marex Financial: Acting for a claimant fund seeking to recover damages (in the tens of millions of pounds) arising from the forced liquidation of its position by a broker (led by Edward Cumming KC).
  • As sole counsel, advising defrauded customers in relation to possible breaches of the Quincecare duty by major banks.
  • As sole counsel, advising on potential claims under s. 138D of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and the FCA’s Conduct of Business Sourcebook in respect of the mis-selling of derivative products to retail clients.
  • Acting for a class of claimants bringing proceedings under s. 90 and 90A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 in relation to a multi-billion pound energy company (led by Edward Cumming KC).
  • Advising on questions of jurisdiction in a claim under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (led by Oliver Assersohn KC) .
  • A claim involving interest rate swaps and the manipulation of LIBOR (as a pupil, with Adam Cloherty KC).

Harry is rapidly establishing a reputation as a go-to junior for civil fraud and asset tracing cases. He has been involved in some of the most high-value fraud claims recently before the High Court, and is also developing a strong sole practice in this field.

  • Voltaire Capital Holdings Limited v Watson & Ors: Acting (led by Hugh Miall KC) for two of the defendants to this US$100m civil fraud claim concerning the affairs of an FX company, spanning allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation, unlawful means conspiracy and breach of fiduciary duty. Harry recently appeared unled at an interim hearing against five silks.
  • Humphrey v Bennett [2024] BCC 33; [2023] EWCA Civ 1433: Acting (led by Steven Reed) for the respondents on this long-running derivative action involving alleged diversions of opportunity, conflicts of interest, and allegations of fraud. Harry has appeared successfully before both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, where his submissions about the statutory relief available to directors were unanimously accepted by the court. The most recent judgment ([2025] EWHC 448 (Ch)) deals with novel issues in the law of unjust enrichment and knowing receipt of registered land.
  • Betta Oceanway Company v SC Tomini Trading SRL [2024] EWHC 2068 (Comm): Acting in a complex, multi-jurisdictional contract dispute worth in the region of USD $50million arising from scrap metal shipping contracts (led by Steven Reed). The case involves significant allegations of fraud and a complex shareholder dispute.
  • Durnont Enterprises Limited v M-JWK Management: Acting for defendants to a complex derivative claim said to be worth over €100million, involving allegations of fraud and unlawful means conspiracy in relation to the alleged expropriation of investment certificates. The claim deals with English, Polish and Cypriot law.
  • Yuntian Leasing DAC v Dream Aircraft Holdings Ltd: Acting for a multi-million pound judgment creditor seeking to enforce. The claims involve allegations of sham agreements, transactions defrauding creditors under s. 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986, and significant procedural applications, often with a multi-jurisdictional element (led by Elspeth Talbot Rice KC and Andrew Holden).
  • Re A Company (in liq): Advising the liquidators of a company on the potential status of a former employee as a shadow director or de facto director, in the context of her perpetration of a multi-million pound fraud. Harry also advises generally in relation to proceedings against that person for breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent trading, misfeasance, unlawful means conspiracy, and unjust enrichment, and against her associates for dishonest assistance and knowing receipt.
  • Turner v FAGD Ltd: As sole counsel, acting for the defendants in this Commercial Court claim involving allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation in relation to the sale of shares in a company.
  • A v B: As sole counsel, acting on behalf of a major US company seeking to recover fraudulently misappropriated moneys from its former Chief Executive Officer.
  • Federal Republic of Nigeria v Process and Industrial Developments Limited [2023] EWHC 2638 (Comm): Acting for the defendant to a multi-billion dollar arbitration challenge before the High Court in relation to issues of disclosure and privilege, where the grounds for the challenge included serious allegations of fraud and corruption.

Commercial litigation is a major part of Harry’s practice. Ranked as a ‘rising star’ in commercial disputes in the Legal 500 2027, he has been described in this field as “a very talented junior with a bright future ahead of him.” With experience acting both led and unled in the County Court, High Court and Court of Appeal across several key sectors, he is developing a strong reputation as a go-to junior in this field.

Examples of his experience include:

  • Voltaire Capital Holdings Limited v Watson & Ors: Acting (led by Hugh Miall KC) for two of the defendants to this US$100m civil fraud claim concerning the affairs of an FX company, spanning allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation, unlawful means conspiracy and breach of fiduciary duty. Harry recently appeared unled at an interim hearing against five silks.
  • Ocean Freight Offshore Master Fund Limited v Marex Financial: Acting for a claimant fund seeking to recover damages (in the tens of millions of pounds) arising from the forced liquidation of its position by a broker (led by Edward Cumming KC).
  • Humphrey v Bennett [2024] BCC 33; [2023] EWCA Civ 1433: Acting (led by Steven Reed) for the respondents on this long-running derivative action involving alleged diversions of opportunity, conflicts of interest, and allegations of fraud. Harry has appeared successfully before both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, where his submissions about the statutory relief available to directors were unanimously accepted by the court. The most recent judgment ([2025] EWHC 448 (Ch)) deals with novel issues in the law of unjust enrichment and knowing receipt of registered land.
  • Betta Oceanway Company v SC Tomini Trading SRL [2024] EWHC 2068 (Comm): Acting (led by Steven Reed) in a complex, multi-jurisdictional contract dispute worth in the region of USD $50million arising from scrap metal shipping contracts. The case involves significant allegations of fraud and a complex shareholder dispute.
  • Durnont Enterprises Ltd v M-JWK Management: Acting for defendants to a complex, multi-jurisdictional derivative claim said to be worth over €100million. The claims involve allegations of breach of contract and breach of foreign law quasi-fiduciary duties in relation to a Polish investment fund.
  • Re A Company: Acting for a multi-national company in a High Court claim seeking to recover tens of millions of pounds from its nominees.
  • DGL Group Limited v R&A Sales Limited: As sole counsel, successfully resisting applications for delivery-up and freezing orders in the context of multi-million pound fraud proceedings in the High Court. Harry’s application for summary judgment and strike-out led the Claimant to discontinue unconditionally against his client.
  • Instagroup Ltd v Tori: As sole counsel, successfully acting at trial for the defendant to a claim under a personal guarantee. The claim involved detailed consideration of the proper construction of a guarantee, and the potential application of a Braganza-type implied term.
  • Federal Republic of Nigeria v Process and Industrial Developments Limited [2023] EWHC 2638 (Comm): Acting for the defendant to a multi-billion dollar arbitration challenge before the High Court in relation to issues of disclosure and privilege, where the grounds for the challenge included serious allegations of fraud and corruption.
  • Starting Point Recruitment Limited v Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council [2024] EWHC 982 (Comm): Acting  for the Claimant recruitment agency alleging various breaches of a framework agreement, including an implied obligation of good faith (led by Steven Reed). Harry successfully opposed an interlocutory application for security for costs.
  • Advising on potential claims in relation to bribery, secret commissions and half-secret commissions (led by Edward Cumming KC).
  • As sole counsel, acting for a company seeking damages for misrepresentation and breach of contract related to improperly advertised hospitality at the FIFA World Cup in Qatar.
  • Acting for dissenting shareholders in complex share value appraisal proceedings in the Cayman Islands (led by Robert Levy KC).

Harry has a particular expertise in company law. In addition to having taught company law at the University of Cambridge, he is ranked as a ‘rising star’ in this area in the Legal 500, where he is described as “punching above his call”, “very clever, strategic, hands-on and an asset to any team”, and having “advocacy skills above the level of his call”.

With experience of contentious and non-contentious company business alike, ranging from transactional advice to bitterly-contested shareholder disputes, Harry is establishing a firm reputation in this field.

Contentious

  • Abhari v Menzel: Acting (as sole counsel) for a minority shareholder in these unfair prejudice proceedings relating to an investment management company handling renewable energy investments in excess of EUR€100m. It is alleged that the defendant directors diverted business away from the company, paid themselves excessive remuneration, and excluded the petitioner from the management of the company.
  • Durnont Enterprises Limited v Fazita Investment Limited & Ors [2026] EWHC 405 (Ch): Acting for two defendants to this multi-jurisdictional derivative claim said to be worth EUR€100m. The claim relates to a Cypriot company and its principal assets, the bearer certificates in a Polish investment fund. The Claimants allege that the Defendants defrauded it of those certificates.
  • Re Alba Insulation Limited [2026] EWHC 832 (Ch): Acting for the directors of a company in liquidation in this appeal against the admission of a proof of debt by the liquidators under IR 14.8(3). Harry also acts for the directors as respondents to a misfeasance application under section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986.
  • Humphrey v Bennett [2024] BCC 33; [2023] EWCA Civ 1433: Acting (led by Steven Reed) for the respondents on this long-running derivative action involving alleged diversions of opportunity, conflicts of interest, and allegations of fraud. Harry has appeared successfully before both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, where his submissions about the statutory relief available to directors were unanimously accepted by the court. The most recent judgment ([2025] EWHC 448 (Ch)) deals with novel issues in the law of unjust enrichment and knowing receipt of registered land.
  • Lorimer-Wing v Hashmi [2025] EWHC 2757 (Ch): Acting for a respondent minority shareholder in relation to an appeal against a share buyout order following unfair prejudice proceedings. Harry appeared (as sole counsel) on an application for security for the costs of an appeal.
  • Betta Oceanway Company v SC Tomini Trading SRL [2025] EWCA Civ 595: Acting (led by Steven Reed) for the Claimant in a complex, multi-jurisdictional contract dispute worth in the region of USD $50million arising from scrap metal shipping contracts. The case involves significant allegations of fraud and a complex shareholder dispute. Harry also appeared in the Court of Appeal in this case, dealing with whether a minority shareholder who was alleging fraud should be joined as a defendant to advance his allegations within the proceedings.
  • Singh v Malta (U.K.) Ltd: Acting, as sole counsel, for the defendant in these High Court proceedings for a declaration as to the proper ownership of the shares in a company.
    • O’Donnell v O’Donnell: Acting for the claimant in this High Court claim for the specific performance of a share sale agreement in respect of a series of companies in the West Midlands.
    • A v B: As sole counsel, acting on behalf of a major US company seeking to recover fraudulently misappropriated moneys from its former Chief Executive Officer. The claim involved allegations of breach of fiduciary and statutory duty in England and in an overseas jurisdiction.
    • Re A Company (in liq): Advising the liquidators of a company on the potential status of a former employee as a shadow director or de facto director, in the context of her perpetration of a multi-million pound fraud. Harry also advises generally in relation to proceedings against that person for breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent trading, misfeasance, unlawful means conspiracy, and unjust enrichment, and against her associates for dishonest assistance and knowing receipt.
    • As sole counsel, advising on unfair prejudice proceedings involving a multi-million dollar company in the High Court of Singapore.

    Non-contentious/transactional

    • Advising (led by Edward Cumming KC) on a corporate deal, including difficult issues surrounding the proper ownership and registration of shares following the intestacy of a member. The case touched on pre-emption rights and the rights of personal representatives under s. 773 of the Companies Act 2006.
    • Re A Company: Successfully acting, as sole counsel, to rectify the register of companies under s. 1096 of the Companies Act 2006.
    • Re A Company: Successfully acting, as sole counsel, to extend time for registration of a charge.
    • Acting, as sole counsel, on several winding-up petitions in the High Court, and related insolvency matters (e.g. setting aside statutory demands, and advising on strategies to resist intimated winding-up proceedings).

    Ranked as a ‘leading junior’ in insolvency in the Legal 500, Harry has a wide range of experience with insolvency work. In addition to that, Harry has also been appointed to the Attorney General’s C Panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown, in which capacity Harry regularly considers insolvency issues, including in relation to directors’ disqualification.

    Harry has a wide range of experience with insolvency work, including:

    • Secretary of State for Business and Trade v McDonnell (unreported, 3 July 2026): Acting for the Secretary of State at this trial of a directors’ disqualification application. Harry successfully obtained disqualification and compensation orders.
    • Re Alba Insulation Limited [2026] EWHC 832 (Ch): Acting for the directors of a company in liquidation in this appeal against the admission of a proof of debt by the liquidators under IR 14.8(3).
    • Re Richards Solicitors: Acting for a creditor of an insolvent partnership in these High Court proceedings, seeking permission to bring winding-up petitions against the former partners for unpaid debts. The application gave rise to novel and difficult questions of the law of insolvent partnerships.
    • Yuntian Leasing DAC v Dream Aircraft Holdings Ltd: Acting (led by Elspeth Talbot Rice KC and Andrew Holden) for a multi-million pound judgment creditor seeking to enforce. The claims involve allegations of sham agreements, transactions defrauding creditors under s. 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986, and significant procedural applications, often with a multi-jurisdictional element.
    • Re Kei Kin Hung: Acting for the creditor on this complex bankruptcy application worth in the tens of millions of pounds. The case involves questions of jurisdiction and mental capacity.
    • Re Ferguson: As sole counsel, acting for the respondent creditor on the debtor’s application to set aside a statutory demand in the hundreds of thousands of pounds. Harry successfully obtained the dismissal of the application, following a full day’s hearing involving consideration of the law of guarantees, undue influence, contractual construction, and the law of Jersey.
    • Re A Company (in liq): Advising the liquidators of a company on the potential status of a former employee as a shadow director or de facto director, in the context of her perpetration of a multi-million pound fraud. Harry also advises generally in relation to proceedings against that person for breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent trading, misfeasance, unlawful means conspiracy, and unjust enrichment, and against her associates for dishonest assistance and knowing receipt.
    • Re Bakers Travel Ltd: Acting for the respondent directors to High Court proceedings alleging misfeasance, wrongful trading, unlawful preferences, and the reversal of void transactions.
    • Acting, as sole counsel, on several winding-up petitions in the High Court, and related insolvency matters (e.g. setting aside statutory demands, and advising on strategies to resist intimated winding-up proceedings).
    • Acting, as sole counsel, on numerous bankruptcy petitions, both on the creditor and the debtor side.
    • Acting, as sole counsel, for a trustee in bankruptcy seeking an order for sale of a bankrupt’s property under section 335A of the Insolvency Act 1986.

    Harry has extensive experience of offshore, international and multi-jurisdictional disputes. He has assisted in drafting and advising on claims and defences in all the major offshore centres, including Jersey, Guernsey, the BVI, the Cayman Islands, the Isle of Man, The Bahamas, Singapore, and the Turks and Caicos Islands. Some recent examples of his offshore practice include:

    • Petronas South Caucasus SARL & Anor v Therium Group Holdings Limited & Ors (Royal Court of Jersey): Acting (with Advocate Turnbull and led by Daniel Warents) for two defendants to an unlawful means conspiracy claim in the Royal Court of Jersey. The claim arises out of a c. US$15bn arbitral award made against the State of Malaysia, and engages complex issues of Spanish law, judicial proceedings immunity, the double actionability rule, and issues of forum non conveniens within jurisdiction challenges.
    • Re K Trust (Royal Court of Guernsey): As sole counsel, acting for the beneficiary of a Jersey law trust in respect of claims in gross negligence, relating to improper trust investments and inadequate supervision resulting in a seven-figure loss to the fund.
    • Re Ferguson: As sole counsel, dealing with points of Jersey law in English proceedings concerning the recovery of unpaid trustee fees.
    • Re X (Royal Court of Guernsey): As sole counsel, advising and drafting applications in relation to a dispute over the ownership of shares in a Guernsey company.
    • As sole counsel, acting for a pension services provider in Guernsey bringing claims for non-payment of service fees against a customer. The claim raised difficult questions of jurisdiction and service out.
    • Re X and Y Trusts (unreported, 29 November 2022, Cayman Grand Court): Advising trustees in the Cayman Islands (led by Elspeth Talbot Rice KC and Andrew Holden) on an application for directions involving complex issues of third-party rights and the Guardian Trust
    • Re O Trust (Cayman Grand Court): Acting for a trustee in the Cayman Islands on an application in the Grand Court (by the trustee) to retire and be replaced, and for ancillary confidentiality orders. The substantive application was later the subject of a public judgment: Re O Trust (unreported, 16 December 2024).
    • Advising the beneficiary of a multi-billion dollar series of offshore trusts (Cayman Islands, Jersey, Cyprus, BVI) in relation to potential claims against the trustees and the protectors for breach of fiduciary duty.
    • Re S: Advising a judgment debtor in the Isle of Man on enforcement proceedings against his property.
    • Advising a trustee in Guernsey in respect of the proper administration of trust property in the context of illiquidity issues and allegations of fraud against the trust settlor (led by Elspeth Talbot Rice KC and Andrew Holden).
    • Acting for a defendant trustee facing allegations of fraudulent breach of trust in an offshore jurisdiction.
    • Re Qihoo: Acting in a three-week trial for dissenting shareholders in complex share value appraisal proceedings in the Cayman Islands. Harry was responsible for preparing cross-examination of corporate and expert witnesses.
    • Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Acting for the defendant bank as part of a large team of counsel on a substantial commercial dispute, involving allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation, between an investment bank and a high net worth client.
    • Advising, as sole counsel, on unfair prejudice proceedings involving a multi-million dollar company in the High Court of Singapore.

    Harry has extensive experience acting as counsel at mediation. He has been praised for his robust advice, his personable manner, and the rapport he builds with clients in often difficult circumstances. His most recent experience includes:

    • Acting at mediation on behalf of various charities in relation to a claim under the 1975 Act.
    • Acting at a Chancery FDR on behalf of charities in relation to a proprietary estoppel and 1975 Act claim.
    • Acting at mediation on behalf of an executor defendant to a 1975 Act claim.
    • Acting at mediation on behalf of charities in relation to a will validity dispute.

    In his capacity as a By-Fellow of Hughes Hall, University of Cambridge, Harry has taught land law for several years, and therefore has a strong grasp of real estate litigation. He has acted as sole counsel in multiple sets of possession proceedings and business tenancy renewal proceedings, and has appeared in all forms of court on difficult points of land law. These include:

    • Re K: As sole counsel, acting for a tenant seeking damages for breach of various leasehold covenants and under the Defective Premises Act 1972.
    • Humphrey v Bennett [2025] EWHC 448 (Ch): Arguing in the High Court (for the first time since the Supreme Court’s decision in Byers v Saudi National Bank) that a claim for knowing receipt of registered land should be struck out on a proper construction of section 29 of the Land Registration Act 2002 (Led by Steven Reed).
    • Re L: Advising a right-to-manage company on forfeiture proceedings and service charge proceedings in the First-Tier Tribunal.
    • Reid v Reid: As sole counsel, acting in the High Court for a claimant seeking to vindicate her interest in a property in the West Midlands. The case involved allegations of a common intention constructive trust, breach of trust on the footing of sale at an undervalue, and abuse of a power of attorney.
    • Radwan v Al-Sultan: Led by Tom Montagu-Smith KC, acting for the defendants to these High Court proceedings concerning the ownership of property in London, involving allegations of a common intention constructive trust.
    • Re J: As sole counsel, advising a freehold proprietor on whether (i) a contract with a commercial partner should be construed as a lease or a licence; (ii) whether an ultimate occupier of the property was a mere licensee or occupied under a Bruton tenancy; and (iii) obtaining vacant possession of the property.
    • Re S: Advising on the application of common intention constructive trust principles in the context of a charging order application.
    • Re Estate of X: Advising on an allegedly fraudulent transfer of property into joint names, the effect of the resultant joint tenancy after the death of one of the owners, and potential alternative remedies in rescission for unilateral mistake.
    • SEP Properties Ltd v Abdalla: Acting for a judgment creditor in respect of two final charging orders and an application for an order for sale.
    • Advising a mortgagor on contested possession proceedings in complex factual circumstances.
    • As sole counsel, advising a client on the operation of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1988, the proper construction of a lease, and the effects of assignment on restrictive covenants.

    Harry has a healthy practice in sports and sports-adjacent disputes, particularly contractual claims. He also has a particular interest in cricket-related regulatory disputes, including ECB and ICC disciplinary panels and disputes arising out of franchising arrangements (particularly novel disputes arising out of the ownership of The Hundred teams) and is especially happy to be instructed whether led or unled. His recent experience includes:

    • A contractual claim arising out of the FIFA World Cup 2022 in Qatar.
    • A contractual claim arising out of the Rugby World Cup 2023 in France.
    • A dispute between a sponsor, a racing driver, and a racing team involving allegations of fraud and unlawful means conspiracy.
    • Assisting in advising the directors of a rugby club on dividend payments and a potential unfair prejudice petition.

    Ranked as ‘up and coming’ for Chancery: Traditional in the Chambers & Partners High Net Worth Guide 2025 — the only barrister of his call to be listed — Harry is rapidly developing a reputation as a go-to junior in this area. He has a wide range of experience in trusts, probate and estates litigation, from dealing with smaller estates to litigating over highly complex contentious trusts both onshore and offshore.

    Contentious trusts

    • FMA v BBA & Ors: Acting for one of the trustees of a significant family settlement in complex, bitterly-contested High Court proceedings for the removal of the Defendant trustee. The case dealt with issues relating to escheat of English real property, allegations of breach of trust, the rule in Saunders v Vautier, and reflective loss (led by Timothy Sherwin).
    • Confidential (2026): Advising on the enforceability of a series of trusts suspected to be sham and/or illusory trusts, including issues arising around the non-vesting of shares in the trustees and the principle in Strong v Bird.
      • Confidential (2026): Advising on a complex series of trusts in issue in family finance proceedings, including as to (i) the correct analysis of an interlocking series of discretionary trusts and (ii) the status of the trusts as ‘assets’ of the spouse under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.Confidential (2025): Advising the former trustee of an offshore trust about potential claims arising in respect of an alleged fraud perpetrated on the trust.
      • Re K Trust (Royal Court of Guernsey, 2025): As sole counsel, acting for the beneficiary of a Jersey law trust in respect of claims in gross negligence, relating to improper trust investments and inadequate supervision resulting in a seven-figure loss to the fund.
      • Folds Farm Trustees Ltd v Cutts [2024] EWHC 2143 (Ch): As sole counsel, Harry acted at short notice for the beneficiary of a complex family trust at a hearing consequential upon a contentious blessing application. Despite adverse findings at trial (before Harry’s instruction), Harry successfully obtained an order awarding his client her costs out of the trust fund.
      • Re X and Y Trusts (unreported, 29 November 2022): Advising trustees in the Cayman Islands (led by Elspeth Talbot Rice KC and Andrew Holden) on an application for directions involving complex issues of third-party rights and the Guardian Trust
      • Confidential: Advising the secondary beneficiaries of a high-value family discretionary trust on a potential application for disclosure against the trustees, and the prospects of success of a claim for breach of trust in respect of an allegedly irrational distribution.
      • Confidential: Advising a trustee in Guernsey (led by Elspeth Talbot Rice KC and Andrew Holden) in respect of the proper administration of trust property in the context of illiquidity issues and allegations of fraud against the trust settlor.
      • Paris Smith Trust Corporation Ltd v Doyle (unreported): As sole counsel, acting for a trustee in a blessing application before the High Court, including complex issues of third party claims to the trust fund, the Guardian Trust principle, and put up or shut up orders.
      • Re S Trust: Advising trustees in relation to the proper construction of the beneficial class of a trust in light of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Convention on Human Rights
      • Re M Trust: Advising the beneficiary of an elaborate structure of family trusts on the trustee’s disclosure duties, and on related issues of rescission for equitable mistake, misrepresentation and undue influence potentially worth in the tens of millions of pounds
      • Re J and O Trusts: Advising the trustees of a Jersey law trust in relation to an intimated claim of breach of trust concerning investment of trust assets.
      • Re L Trust: Advising beneficiaries of an English trust in relation to contemplated applications for disclosure and claims for breach of trust.

       

      Contentious probate

      • Re W’s Estate (2025): Acting as sole counsel for the executor of an estate defending a testamentary incapacity claim.
      • Re B’s Estate: Acting a sole counsel for two Claimants seeking the revocation of a grant of probate on grounds that it was obtained by providing false information to the District Registry. The claim involves complex conflict of law issues concerning property in multiple jurisdictions.
      • Pattinson v Winsor [2023] EWHC 3169 (Ch): Acting at trial for the executors of an estate seeking to propound the last will of the deceased. Harry successfully resisted a counterclaim seeking to set the will aside on the grounds of fraudulent calumny and undue influence.
      • Re X: Acting as sole counsel for the Defendant to a claim seeking to set aside a will which has already been admitted to probate. The claim involved multi-jurisdictional issues, laches, and a counterclaim for undue influence.
      • Acting for children seeking to bring a claim in proprietary estoppel following their exclusion from their surviving parent’s will, which had allegedly reneged on a promise made to the deceased parent (led by Edward Cumming KC).
      • Acting for two major national charities in relation to a potential claim attacking the validity of a will on the grounds of testamentary incapacity.
      • Acting for the executors of an estate seeking to strike out an appearance entered under the Non-Contentious Probate Rules for being frivolous or vexatious.

       

      Claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975

      • Robinson v Robinson (unreported): Acting (sole counsel) for the defendant executrix to 1975 Act proceedings brought by an estranged adult child of the deceased. Harry successfully defended the claim after a two-day trial and the complex cross-examination of the claimant.
      • Re L’s Estate: Acting (sole counsel, High Court) for a claimant surviving spouse seeking to bring 1975 Act proceedings in relation to the estate of her deceased husband. The claim also involves an application, under section 4 of the 1975 Act, for an extension of time.
      • Archibald v Sinclair: Acting (led by Timothy Sherwin) for defendant executors seeking Beddoe relief in relation to a claim under the 1975 Act brought by an alleged ‘child of the family’. The later substantive proceedings are reported at [2023] EWHC 2515 (Ch).
      • Stanton v Stanton: Acting (sole counsel, High Court) for defendant beneficiary in a 1975 Act claim brought by an administratrix in the context of an intestacy. Also includes a claim to set aside a disposition of property on the grounds of undue influence.
      • Hyman v Harris: Acting (sole counsel, High Court) for defendant beneficiaries in a 1975 Act claim brought by a disappointed, unmarried partner of the deceased. Also includes various claims in undue influence, sham, proprietary estoppel and common intention constructive trust.
      • Findlay v Robinson: Acting (sole counsel, High Court) for defendant executrix and sole beneficiary in a 1975 Act claim brought by children of the deceased. Harry successfully obtained an order setting aside the claim form on the basis of service out of time (and successfully resisted an application for an extension and/or relief from sanctions).
      • Confidential: Acting (as sole counsel) on behalf of major charities defending 1975 Act claims by disappointed children.
      • Confidential: Acting (as sole counsel) on behalf of major charities defending 1975 Act claims by alleged ‘children of the family’.

          Recommendations

          Chancery: Traditional

          Chambers and Partners 

          ‘Harry Samuels is very diligent, and his preparation and advocacy are top notch.’ (Chambers High Net Worth 2026)

          Read more

          ‘Harry is very thorough, very strategic and a delight to instruct.’  (2026)

          ‘Harry Samuels is one to watch out for. He is really impressive. He is just so efficient and extremely clever, but an absolute pleasure to deal with.’ (2026)

          ‘Harry is a brilliant advocate. He has the ear of the judge and constructs very persuasive arguments which he delivers very tenaciously.’ His written advice and drafting is of a very high standard. (Chambers UK Bar Guide 2026, Chambers High Net Worth 2025)

          ‘Harry Samuels has a combination of being great at law but applying it in a strong way to fight for his clients.’ (2026)

          ‘He is my go-to at the junior end. He is willing to get stuck in. He also has a good handle on strategy and always instils confidence. He works on a good mix of trusts, probate and company matters.’ (Chambers High Net Worth 2025)

          ‘Harry works very hard and is very bright. He is definitely a star, he is going to go very far.’ (Chambers High Net Worth 2025)

          Contact details

          +44 (0)20 7691 2424
          harry.samuels@xxiv.co.uk
          Contact clerks
          Download vCard
          LinkedIn

          Additional information

          • BA Classics (First Class, 5th in year), New College, Oxford (2014-2018)
          • Graduate Diploma in Law, City University of London (2018-2019)
          • LLM Bar Professional Training (Distinction, 1st in year), City University of London (2019-2020)
          • By-Fellow in Law — Hughes Hall, University of Cambridge
          • Attorney General’s C Panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown (2025)
          • Honourable Society of Gray’s Inn
          • COMBAR (The Commercial Bar Association)
          • ChBA (Chancery Bar Association)
          • ConTrA (Contentious Trusts Association)

          French (good); Spanish (moderate); Italian (moderate)

          • Arden Scholarship (Gray’s Inn’s top pupillage prize, 2021)
          • Norman Tapp Memorial Prize for Mooting (Gray’s Inn, 2021)
          • Dean’s Award (only student in the school’s history to obtain the top grade in all core Bar exams plus a distinction on the extra LLM component, City University of London, 2021)
          • Scarman Prize (City University of London, 2021)
          • OUP Prize for Excellence in Advocacy and Procedure (City University of London, 2021)
          • Bedingfield Scholarship (Gray’s Inn’s top Bar Course award, 2019)
          • David Karmel Scholarship (Gray’s Inn’s top GDL award, 2018)
          • Benefactors’ Prize (New College, Oxford, 2018)

          Business details


          VAT number:
          402 2584 33
          Registered name:
          Henry Samuels

          Related insights and news

          Read more about Global Boardroom Battles: Strategy, Power and Cross‑Border Leverage

          View all related insights and news

          Portfolio Builder

          Select the legal expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

          Download    Add to portfolio   
          Portfolio
          Title Type CV Email

          Remove All

          Download


          Click here to share this shortlist.
          (It will expire after 30 days.)