• Art, Cultural Property & Media

  Edward is often instructed in disputes between major auction houses, vendors and purchasers (or potential purchasers) concerning provenance and the true ownership of important pieces of art, he is a respected lecturer on the subject of art litigation, having spoken at a symposium entitled “Dealing in Looted Art from Post-Conflict Countries” during Frieze London (which has led to Edward being involved in founding a group to promote industry action to combat dealing in looted art and cultural property).

• Aviation

  Aviation litigation has always formed a substantial part of Edward’s practice, and he is familiar both with a wide-range of technical matters as well as the complexities and nuances of issues relating to aircraft maintenance regimes and the regulation of aviation more broadly.  During the course of his career, he has been retained by many of the largest airlines and airport operators and has appeared in some of the leading aviation cases, including the first case to consider the meaning of ‘airworthiness’ of an aircraft, Olympic Airlines (in special liquidation) v ACG Acquisition XX LLC [2013] EWCA 369 and [2012] EWHC 1070 (Comm), which was also the first case in which a court has refused summary judgment for rent despite the lessee having signed a certificate of acceptance.

  Highlights of his most recent work include:

  • Optimares v Qatar Airways (ongoing) – Edward acts for Qatar Airways in these ongoing Commercial Court proceedings, in which more than US$100m is in dispute, regarding the airline’s decision to terminate orders for new seats and associated equipment for a significant proportion of its fleet.
  • LCIA arbitration (ongoing) – Edward acts for an airport that is a leading international hub in a EUR35m dispute with a leading budget airline.
  • Toerama v Odyssey Aviation (2020) – Edward acted for the vendor in this US$30m dispute concerning the abortive sale of a B737-72U aircraft.
  • Edward has long advised Heathrow Airport on a variety of contractual issues with airlines and third party service providers.
  • Aldersey Aviation Ltd v Murray – Edward represents an experienced pilot in this claim by his former employer for damages allegedly resulting from a collision which took place as the pilot landed a Gulfstream Commander at Chester Airport.
• Banking and Financial Services

  Edward has a broad experience of a range of banking and financial services disputes (both retail and commercial, domestic and international) in addition to his particular experience of hedge fund disputes.

  He has advised on cases involving capital markets and the trading of financial derivatives including disputes over contracts for differences, spread bets and options. He has developed a good understanding of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (‘FSMA 2000′), as well as having particular experience of financial and corporate regulation in Guernsey (where he is presently instructed on a multi-million pound claim for fraudulent/negligent investment advice) and the BVI.

  He also frequently acts on and advises in relation to cases involving guarantees, indemnities and security rights in relation to real and personal property (particularly where they may involve challenges to creditors’ rights).

  Edward has experience of a wide variety of mis-selling claims (acting for financial institutions, other businesses and retail customers). In recent years he has developed particular expertise in disputes arising from the sale by various major banks of interest rate hedging products (including swaps, caps, floors and collars) to small business customers.

  He was recently instructed, with Alexander Pelling, in a FFA dispute in the Commercial Court and regularly undertakes a range of work for spread-betting companies.

  He is presently heavily engaged in Re Carlyle Capital Corporation (in liquidation) (ongoing). Edward acts for the Carlyle Group (the renowned American based global asset management firm) and its high-profile directors in a multi-jurisdictional, $1billion investment management dispute arising from the insolvency of Carlyle Capital, its Guernsey-based mortgage investment spin-off. The matter has been the subject of bitterly disputed and ongoing jurisdiction battles in Delaware, Washington DC, New York and now Guernsey.

• Civil Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

  Edward has a particular interest in civil fraud and asset recovery disputes. He has acted in several major dishonesty and fraud cases, often involving international elements, and has extensive experience of freezing injunctions (including their discharge and abuse), orders for disclosure and other asset preservation and tracing remedies (including those involving offshore trusts).

  Recent work in this area includes:

  • Thomas & Pick (as liquidators of GBI Investments Ltd) v Jakes & Nestarec [2012] EWHC 525 (Ch), [2011] EWHC 2619 (Ch): acting as sole counsel Edward successfully pursued an application to commit two company directors to prison for contempt of court in (a) transferring bearer shares to a third party, despite an order that they deliver them up to English liquidators, and (b) deliberately deceiving the court at an earlier hearing by advancing a false case. Each respondent was sentenced to 1 year’s imprisonment.
  • Edward continues to advise the liquidators of GBI Investments Ltd regarding ongoing international asset recovery matters (encompassing jurisdictions including Slovakia, the Czech Republic and the United States).
  • Being instructed on behalf of receivers in Cadogan Petroleum Plc v Tolley a major fraud claim in the Chancery Division.
  • Assisting a Manx company in a multi-million pound claim before the Royal Court of Guernsey for fraudulent investment advice.
  • Acting for one of the oldest art galleries in the world in a claim against the sole director of a sales agent for dishonest assistance and knowing receipt.

  Together with Elspeth Talbot Rice QC he successfully opposed an application for permission to amend to allege fraud in Fattal and others v Walbrook Trustees (Jersey) Ltd and others [2011] 1 All ER (Comm) 647, [2010] EWHC 2767 (Ch), a case concerning alleged mismanagement and abuse of a complex offshore trust and corporate structure.

• Commercial Litigation

  Edward deals with a wide range of contractual and other commercial and business disputes in the High Court, the County Court and arbitration. Having studied in the USA at the University of Pennsylvania Law School and the Wharton Business School, Edward has particular strength in international and offshore matters in line with XXIV Old Buildings’ expertise in this area. He has extensive recent experience of disputes in which important principles of the conflict of laws (including jurisdiction and proper law disputes) have proved decisive, and of applications for anti-suit injunctions.

  He is recommended for commercial dispute resolution by Chambers & Partners 2014, which notes that “[s]ources are quick to highlight him as a junior to pay close attention to whose expertise belies his year of call” and observes that Edward “has already developed superb advocacy skills and has sound judgment“.

  Highlights of his recent work include:

  • Re Carlyle Capital Corporation (in liquidation) (ongoing): Edward acts for the Carlyle Group (the renowned American based global asset management firm) and its high-profile directors in a multi-jurisdictional, $1billion investment management dispute arising from the insolvency of Carlyle Capital, its Guernsey-based mortgage investment spin-off. The matter has been the subject of bitterly disputed and ongoing jurisdiction battles in Delaware, Washington DC, New York and now Guernsey;
  • Acting on behalf of a leading London art dealer in the latest round of litigation in HRH Prince Jefri Bolkiah v Brunei Investment Authoritybeing pursued in both London and New York;
  • A multi-jurisdictional banking dispute worth around US$100 million between a Bahamian company (for which Edward acted along with David Brownbill QC) and a leading Swiss financial services provider. Edward was heavily involved with a jurisdiction challenge in Singapore which was ultimately resolved by the Singapore Court of Appeal (Singapore’s highest court);
  • Acting as sole counsel against a leading silk in an LCIA arbitration concerning an aviation dispute worth over US$11million;
  • Acting with Alan Steinfeld QC and Elspeth Talbot Rice QC in major Chancery Division litigation by which one of four offshore trusts claimed to be entitled to exercise a right of pre-emption in relation to another trust’s interest in companies owning a substantial London commercial and residential property;
  • Chapman v Wilson and others [2010] EWHC 1746 (Ch): Edward appeared on behalf of the successful defendants in a week-long Chancery Division trial of this multi-million pound dispute. The case concerned the validity of a creditor’s appointment of LPA receivers over various assets, including debts and work in progress, of a troubled solicitor’s firm and raised novel questions about the steps necessary under the Bills of Sale Acts to perfect and allow enforcement of various types of security over an individual’s assets;
  • Eagle Aircraft Leasing v Air France (2009-2010): Edward was led by Steven Thompson (as part of a team of counsel from XXIV Old Buildings representing Air France) in this complex Commercial Court claim concerning the delivery of six Boeing 747-400s pursuant to agreements for their sale and purchase;
  • Appeared with Elspeth Talbot Rice QC for creditors of Oilexco North Sea Limited, both at first instance and on the expedited appeal, in Oilexco North Sea Ltd and others v Harms Offshore AHT “Taurus” GmbH & Co KG and another [2010] Ch 187, [2010] 2 WLR 349 the leading Court of Appeal judgment on the courts’ power to grant anti-suit injunctions in support of insolvency proceedings;
  • Representing the estate of a significant artist in a dispute over one of the artist’s most significant pieces (with Elspeth Talbot Rice QC);
  • Advising a well-known provider of financial services about its potential liability as custodian of a Guernsey-based hedge fund affected by the Madoff litigation and potential clawback issues (with David Brownbill QC);
  • Lady Henrietta St George & others v Sir Jack Hayward & others (2008-2009): Edward was instructed (with Stephen Moverley Smith QC and David Herbert) in litigation concerning ownership and control of Freeport, the second-largest port in the Bahamas;
  • Alberg v Kenexa Corp (2008): appeared on behalf of a director and former majority shareholder of a market-leading psychometric testing company in a dispute over ‘earn out’ provisions of a share purchase agreement and associated disclosure requirements;
  • Successfully defending the former chief executive of a prominent sporting body against a claim alleging that he had personally guaranteed certain of the body’s debts;
  • Successful applications for a worldwide freezing injunction both with and without notice in support of a claim regarding the sale of a property in breach of trust in the High Court;
  • Appearing for a well-known clothing brand in a multi-jurisdictional dispute over a terminated distribution agreement with the brand’s French distributor;
  • Acting for a leading hotel and conference centre in a claim against a professional body for unpaid fees relating to a national conference, involving counter-allegations that the facilities and services provided were inadequate; and
  • A wide variety of claims concerning sale of goods, breaches of warranty and the extent of indemnities in share purchase agreements.

  His experience also covers a range of interim and enforcement measures, including freezing orders (their discharge and abuse), orders for disclosure (in particular working with leading and junior counsel on an application for non-party disclosure under CPR 31.17), applications to set aside default judgment, security for costs, unless orders, charging orders and third party debt orders.

  Edward has written an article on “Economic torts after Douglas v Hello” with Philip Shepherd QC.

  More details of Edward’s experience of financial services disputes, hedge fund disputes, civil fraud claims and asset tracing can be found by clicking the relevant box .

• Company

  Edward has particular experience and expertise in company law and related matters, including:

  • Unfair prejudice petitions pursuant to s.459 of the Companies Act 1985 and s.994 of the Companies Act 2006 (together with applications for urgent injunctions in support of such petitions);
  • Petitions for just and equitable winding-up;
  • Winding-up petitions in the Companies Court;
  • Applications for injunctions restraining presentation and/or advertisement of winding-up petitions;
  • Derivative actions;
  • Actions for specific performance of share transfer agreements, including a recent claim concerning a fund based in Hong Kong and investing in North Korea;
  • Claims concerning directors’ duties and responsibilities;
  • Civil fraud claims in a corporate context;
  • Drafting of share purchase agreements;
  • Drafting of memoranda and articles of association, minutes and other corporate documents;
  • Advisory work on company structuring and the launch/listing of offshore funds;
  • Directors’ disqualification proceedings and applications for permission to act as a director notwithstanding disqualification.

  Edward was led by Lawrence Cohen QC in obtaining evidence in aid of proceedings in Texas concerning the valuation of a unique type of very high-value redeemable preference shares in a multinational oil-trading company: L v L (2009).

  Edward was also recently instructed on an urgent basis for a major shareholder and director in a dispute with other shareholders and directors over control of a large group of computer software companies based in both the US and the UK.

• Hedge Funds & Structured Investment Vehicles

  Edward has an exceptional understanding of hedge fund structures and operation having twice been retained for a substantial period of time to advise one of the leading offshore firms on a number of fund matters – both litigious and transactional – in both Guernsey and the British Virgin Islands.

  His experience of hedge fund disputes, multinational shareholder disputes, asset tracing claims (involving offshore trusts and listed multinational companies) and international civil fraud matters includes having recently:

  • advised regarding provisions in the articles and offering memorandum of a (Cayman Islands) fund relating to gating redemptions and redemption management;
  • advised a well-known provider of financial services about its potential liability as custodian of a Guernsey-based hedge fund affected by the Madoff litigation and potential clawback issues (with David Brownbill QC);
  • acted on behalf of the administrator of another Guernsey-based fund in relation to a potential negligence claim against its auditors; and
  • been instructed in a multi-million pound dispute between managing partners of a hedge fund as to how the fund’s profits and losses from its various domestic and international operations should be distributed between them;
  • acting for the Carlyle Group (the renowned American based global asset management firm) and its high-profile directors in a multi-jurisdictional, $1billion investment management dispute arising from the insolvency of Carlyle Capital, its Guernsey-based mortgage investment spin-off.
• Insolvency

  Edward has a particular interest in both corporate insolvency and bankruptcy. He has been repeatedly recognised as a leading insolvency junior by Legal 500 which has recommended him as a “rising star“. He has developed a well-respected practice and has a particularly loyal client base. As well as being an expert contributor to Tolley’s Insolvency Law, his recent work includes:

  • Thomas & Pick (as liquidators of GBI Investments Ltd) v Jakes & Nestarec [2012] EWHC 525 (Ch), [2011] EWHC 2619 (Ch): Edward has advised the liquidators of GBI Investments Ltd on various matters arising from the complicated liquidation of the company, including many difficult issues of cross-border insolvency. Most recently he successfully pursued an application to commit two directors to prison for contempt of court in (a) transferring bearer shares to a third party, despite an order that they deliver them up to the liquidators, and (b) deliberately deceiving the court at an earlier hearing by advancing a false case. Each respondent was sentenced to 1 year’s imprisonment.
  • Appearing successfully at first instance and on appeal in one of the leading recent cases on the remuneration of officeholders which was cited with approval in Brook v Reed [2011] EWCA Civ 331, the leading Court of Appeal authority. Edward successfully opposed an appeal by a trustee-in-bankruptcy against an order fixing the amount of his remuneration and expenses at a little over a tenth of the total amount he sought before Proudman J: Hunt v Yearwood-Grazette [2009] BPIR 810.
  • Acting (with Elspeth Talbot Rice QC) for creditors of Oilexco North Sea Limited both at first instance and on the expedited appeal in Oilexco North Sea Ltd and others v Harms Offshore AHT “Taurus” GmbH & Co KG and another [2010] Ch 187, [2010] 2 WLR 349, [2009] 2 BCLC 473, the leading Court of Appeal judgment on the courts’ power to grant anti-suit injunctions in support of insolvency proceedings.
  • Pursuing a complicated challenge to an IVA in Re Tappenden (2011-2012).
  • Advising a major multi-national group regarding migration of its COMI under the EC Regulation on Insolvency.
  • An application in the High Court on behalf of a trustee-in-bankruptcy in which he successfully obtained a worldwide freezing injunction against the assets of a bankrupt and his wife.
  • Frequent applications to the High Court in respect of administrators’ appointments.
  • Frequent applications for annulment of bankruptcy orders.
  • Written advice concerning the application of the Insolvent Partnerships Order 1994.
  • Written advice on the consequences of annulment of a bankruptcy order.
  • Litigation and advice in relation to the Company Directors’ Disqualification Act 1986 including applications for permission to act notwithstanding disqualification. Edward also regularly speaks about this area to professional audiences.
  • Litigation and advice in relation to possession and sale proceedings.
  • Frequent appearances in the Companies Court pursuant to winding-up petitions, on applications to restrain presentation and/or advertisement of winding-up petitions and on applications for validation orders.

  Edward, together with Elspeth Talbot Rice QC, has produced a Legal Update on the Court of Appeal’s decision in Bloom v Harms Offshore GmbH & Co KG [2010] 2 Ch 187.

  Their article “How long is insolvency’s arm?” has been published in Insolvency Intelligence on 7th July 2010 and the Solicitors’ Journal in October 2010.

  His latest podcast with Elspeth Talbot Rice QC is on the topic of “Anti-suit injunctions in insolvency proceedings” (Clicking on this link takes you to CPDCast’s website where you can access the podcast by setting up a (free) account).

• Partnership and Joint Ventures

  Edward has acted in a wide range of partnership and joint venture disputes, an area of practice in which his business experience proves particularly invaluable.

  In Keegan v Fitzgerald (2011) LTL AC0130343 Edward successfully obtained summary judgment on behalf of the defendant in a bitter joint venture dispute. He persuaded the court that a partner who had been required by the set-off provisions in a facility letter, by which a bank had extended a multi-million pound loan to the partnership, to allow funds which the bank held for him personally to be used to reduce the loan to the partnership could only recover a contribution from the defendant by the taking of an account in equity after the dissolution of the partnership. He was not entitled to pursue a debt claim under CPR Part 7.

  He has also recently advised on a claim for the dissolution of a solicitors’ partnership (where one partner was suspected of frequent unauthorised withdrawals from the partnership account) and a dispute between former partners of a major hedge fund (where there were LLPs and partnership assets in both the UK and the Cayman Islands). He also appeared successfully in a dispute over a partnership which conducted a travel agency business specialising in flights for the Hajj.

  In 2010 and 2011 much of Edward’s time was spent on a massive joint venture dispute in the Chancery Division (see, for example, Fattal and others v Walbrook Trustees (Jersey) Ltd and others [2011] 1 All ER (Comm) 647, [2010] EWHC 2767 (Ch) and Fattal and others v Walbrook Trustees (Jersey) Ltd and others [2010] EWHC 3049 (Ch)) by which one of four trusts claimed to be entitled to exercise a right of pre-emption in relation to another trust’s interest in companies owning a substantial London commercial and residential property. Edward was instructed together with Alan Steinfeld QC and Elspeth Talbot Rice QC.

• Professional Negligence

  Edward has acted and advised in a range of professional negligence claims against
  trustees, auditors, custodians, investment managers both in England and
  offshore. Recent highlights of his experience include:

  • a multi-million pound claim for allegedly fraudulent/negligent investment advice given to a Manx company by a Guernsey-based investment advisor;
  • advising the administrators of a prominent Middle Eastern bank about potential claims against its auditors;
  • acting in a claim against a firm of accountants arising from the way in which they handled a client’s bonus payments which were paid to them rather than their client;
    and
  • advising a well-known provider of financial services about its potential
    liability as custodian of a Guernsey-based hedge fund affected by the
    Madoff litigation and potential clawback issues (with David Brownbill QC).
• Real Estate Litigation

  Edward has a broad experience of property disputes, including possession actions, residential and commercial landlord and tenant (in particular distress and issues arising from service of notices), proprietary estoppel and constructive trust claims and disputes regarding boundaries and rights of way in the High Court, County Courts and Leasehold Valuation Tribunal. In particular:

  • Edward successfully represented a large group of leaseholders in the three-day trial of a half-a-million pound service charge dispute with their local authority freeholder in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal: Fleury & Ors v Westminster City Council (LON/00BK/LSC/2007/0086). See here for the 2008 judgment.
  • He represents a residential tenant in an ongoing dispute with her landlord, its managing agent and the cleaners of the block of flats after the cleaners entered her flat whilst she was away and threw out all of her belongings rather than an adjacent flat which had recently become vacant at the end of a tenancy.
  • Zambra Investments Ltd v Patel & Bagasrawala (LON/00AJ/LBC/2010/0018) (2010): Edward acted for the successful Respondent in this claim for a declaration under s.168 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 that the Respondents had breached covenants in their leases.
  • RSPCA v Bowe (2008-2009): Edward successfully acted on behalf of the RSPCA in this Chancery Division claim against a former employee for sums owed under the terms of an employee shared equity scheme.
  • He was recently instructed on behalf of a restaurant owner in the trial of a claim by owners of the property neighbouring the restaurant that his user breached the terms of a restrictive covenant which permitted only the running of a “high-class” restaurant from the premises.
  • Edward frequently advises and has particular experience of both pursuing and defending claims for fees and commission in respect of ‘introductions’ to property transactions.
  • He also has experience of construction-related disputes and multi-party litigation arising from property-development joint ventures. This year he has represented a builder in the three-day trial of a dispute arising from his construction of a loft conversion in which Edward’s rigorous cross-examination proved decisive and is currently acting for a firm which seeks to recover significant unpaid fees in respect of the construction of a development of 30 sustainable “eco-homes”.
• Sport

  As a keen sports enthusiast Edward takes particular interest in the field of sports law. He has been instructed on a variety of matters – often of a sensitive or confidential nature – concerning Formula One, Moto GP, football and cricket.

  His recent experience includes acting for a leading Championship football club in a dispute with a recently sacked manager, successfully defending the former chief executive of a prominent cricketing body against a claim alleging that he had personally guaranteed certain of the body’s debts, acting on behalf of a prominent Premier League footballer (and former captain of his national side) and representing a Formula One team in the High Court in a sponsorship dispute. Edward has particular experience of issues arising from the financing of football clubs and football club insolvencies (including the impact of FA and league rules).

• Trusts, Probate & Estates

  Edward has a particular interest in this central area of practice at XXIV Old Buildings as well as international trust advice and litigation. Clients are impressed by the breadth of his experience of both contentious and advisory work, partly resulting from time spent on secondment, early in his career, to the contentious trust and probate department of one of the pre-eminent London firms of solicitors.

  He is now recommended for chancery work by both Chambers and Partners and Legal 500, and is said to be “A regular participant in heavyweight trust litigation who often takes instructions from notable UK and offshore law firms. He also represents clients in a wide range of other key areas, including Inheritance Act claims, probate disputes and proprietary estoppel suits.”

  The directories released in late 2015 recommend Edward as a leading junior, with sources saying that “He is a lion in court” and “He is very engaging, highly confident and
  he has a good head on his shoulders.” He is also described as “A human dynamo – always available for a call and ready to assist.“

  Chambers & Partners (2014) recommended Edward as a leading junior, noting “his strength in both traditional and commercial chancery work in the UK and abroad” and that he has both “a distinct trusts and estates flavour to his practice” and “considerable experience in the financial services field” which make him “a junior in high demand.“

  “He is straight talking and distils legal issues effectively and quickly. A formidable advocate, while at the same time very good at client facing”

  “He brings to the table substantial courtroom experience and a fearlessness that makes him fight hard for his clients.”

  Chambers & Partners (2013) recommended Edward as an ‘up and coming’ junior, describing him as providing “advice that is bullish as well as accurate and realistic” and keeping “busy with a mix of traditional and commercial chancery works“.

  Chambers & Partners (2012) recommended him saying:

  “Edward Cumming is surely destined for great things, given market feedback. As with his fellows at XXIV Old Buildings, he has cut his teeth on tricky and often deeply bitter international trusts, probate and succession cases. In these cases, he has shown himself to be ‘confident, thorough and an excellent drafter of documents.’”

  He regularly appears in both trials and interlocutory hearings of contentious trust and probate matters. His recent work includes:

  • C and others v C and others: major ongoing trust litigation in both Jersey and Mauritius, involving claims for more than US$100million for alleged breaches of trust.
  • Re K: a bitterly fought dispute in the High Court regarding the administration of a substantial and high-profile estate.
  • Fattal and others v Walbrook Trustees (Jersey) Ltd and others [2011] 1 All ER (Comm) 647, [2010] EWHC 2767 (Ch) and [2010] EWHC 3049 (Ch): Edward appeared with Alan Steinfeld QC and Elspeth Talbot Rice QC in this major trust litigation by which one of four trusts claimed to be entitled to exercise a right of pre-emption in relation to another trust’s interest in companies owning a substantial London commercial and residential property;
  • Obtaining various orders for the urgent and/or interim appointment of administrators in order to safeguard estate assets;
  • Griffin v Griffin (2010):
    appearing at the much-publicised trial of this dispute between two brothers over a sum allegedly owed by one to the other in relation to the administration of their mother’s estate;
  • Re Bell (2008-2010): a procedurally difficult and bitterly-contested probate claim involving allegations of undue influence, want of knowledge and approval and fraud;
  • Re Radford (2009): defending proceedings brought under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 by a deceased husband’s first wife against his wife at his death;
  • Re D’Aguilar (2009): advising the Costa Rican descendants
    of a Spanish conquistador about a claim to substantial monies paid into
    Court as part of 18th century litigation over his estate;
  • Davies v Davies & Atlas Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd (2007-2009):
    acting for the Jersey trustees of an employee benefit trust in English
    ancillary relief proceedings in the Family Division of the High Court;
  • Read v Read & Read (2008-2009): successfully
    representing two brothers, one of whom was executor of their late father’s estate, in various claims brought by a third brother in the Chancery and Family Divisions of the High Court relating to the administration of the estate;
  • Acting for the Guernsey trustees of an Isle of Man trust in English proceedings relating to Manx divorce proceedings;
  • Advising as to the tax-efficient reconstruction of a complicated offshore structure involving both Jersey and Guernsey trusts and a Liechtenstein foundation;
  • Claims for breach of trust and breach of fiduciary duty;
  • Variation of trusts;
  • Substitution of trustees;
  • Applications by trustees for directions;
  • A wide variety of contentious probate claims (including allegations of fraud, undue influence, lack of capacity and want of knowledge and approval);
  • Applications for grants of interim letters of administration and grants ad colligenda bona;
  • Proprietary estoppel claims;
  • Claims and trials of claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975;
  • Proceedings in the Court of Protection in relation to Enduring Powers of Attorney;
  • IHT and CGT planning.

  Edward has twice been retained for a substantial period of time
  to advise the business and trust law department of one of the leading offshore
  firms on a number of matters requiring a detailed understanding of many aspects
  of international estate planning and offshore trust and corporate structures in
  both Guernsey and the British Virgin Islands. He therefore has a good working
  knowledge of the trust laws of these offshore jurisdictions.

Other information

• Recommendations

  ‘Chancery Silk of the Year‘ (shortlisted): Chambers UK Bar Awards (2020-2021).

  ‘Chancery Junior of the Year‘: Chambers UK Bar Awards (2016-2017).

  Aviation

  Chambers & Partners

  A well-known figure at the Aviation Bar, who is particularly adept in technically sophisticated matters relating to regulatory and financing matters. Key areas of strength include cases assessing liability for damage to aircraft under leasing arrangements. Strengths: “A strong advocate, quick on his feet, very thorough, very bright and a pleasure to work with.” (2021)

  Charities

  Chambers & Partners

  Edward Cumming QC is a well-known charities practitioner who undertakes this work as part of a broad chancery practice. His reputation in the area continues to grow, as a result of his advice on some prominent charities disputes. Lately, he has represented philanthropists, charities and other not-for-profit organisations. Strengths: “He’s a very impressive, forceful advocate.” “He’s at the top of his game, he is very creative and imaginative, and he commands respect for his judgements. I have great confidence in his judgement and advice.” (2022)

  Strengths: “Bright and very sharp-witted, he quickly picks up the issues.” “Very hard-working, he goes the extra mile, and has an incredible ability to grapple with points he hasn’t come across before.” (2021)

  Legal 500

  ‘Edward is quite simply brilliant. He has an excellent mind and is exceptional on his feet, dynamic and highly charismatic. A silk who has a keen eye for strategy and a great ability with people.’ (2022)

  ‘He is highly intelligent, quick to pick up the core points including points not picked up by others. His written arguments are very clear.’ (2021)

  Company & Partnership

  Chambers & Partners

  Edward Cumming QC is an impressive company silk who receives routine instructions from a number of top City law firms. His company work benefits from wider capabilities in commercial chancery and civil fraud. Strengths: “A very commercially-minded barrister who forges incredibly strong relationships with solicitors.”

  Strengths: “Absolutely exceptional. He is very hands-on and approachable, and embeds himself as part of the team.” (2021)

  Legal 500

  ‘His knowledge of the law is phenomenal but what sets him apart is his willingness to roll up his sleeves and help in all aspects of the litigation.’ (2022)

  ‘Huge amounts of energy, and an appetite to get involved in the detail of a matter.’ (2021)

  Chancery: Commercial

  Chambers & Partners

  “Accessible and very hard-working. He’s very sensible and not afraid to tackle serious issues.” (2022 – UK and Global)

  “He is phenomenally bright and has an insane capacity for work – a real dynamo. His written work and advocacy put clients at ease.” “A strong advocate – he’s quick on his feet, thorough, very bright and a pleasure to work with.” (2021 – UK and Global)

  Fraud: Civil

  Chambers & Partners

  Edward Cumming QC is a talented silk with a busy commercial practice, which includes frequent civil fraud instructions. He boasts extensive experience in acting as sole counsel. He is well regarded for his handling of matters involving banks. Strengths: “A phenomenal barrister who is very sharp, cuts through the waffle to the main issues and is very decisive.” (2022)

  Strengths: “He is imaginative and super bright.” “A tenacious silk who is very eloquent and meticulous on detail.” “He is responsive, clear and shrewd.” (2021)

  Legal 500

  ‘Devastatingly clever, with a tireless work ethic. He can charm and persuade, but will fight tenaciously when the need arises; he is utterly fearless.’ (2022)

  Chancery: Traditional

  Chambers & Partners

  Edward Cumming QC maintains an excellent market reputation for his approach to complex chancery cases. “He has an incredible intellect and knowledge of the law,” acknowledges an interviewee, who adds: “He leaves no stone unturned in his investigations and advice and his written work and tactical approach are sublime.” Another commentator concludes that Cumming is “truly one of the best barristers in the areas he operates within. His charm and down-to-earth approach is welcomed by clients.” (2022 – High Net Worth)

  Edward Cumming QC is respected for his handling of high-value cases across the full breadth of traditional chancery law. He regularly acts for very wealthy individuals. His recent work has included complex trust litigation. Strengths: “Hugely impressive. He is very approachable, technical and knowledgeable.” (2022)

  Edward Cumming QC has an excellent reputation among interviewees for his approach to difficult chancery cases. A source describes him as “a young silk with boundless energy,” and adds that “he’s fantastic, so involved and engaged, immensely responsive, and judges like him so much as well.” A solicitor says: “He is hugely impressive. He is very approachable, technical and knowledgeable. I rate him incredibly highly.” (2021 – High Net Worth)

  Strengths: “Both delightful and brilliant – he’s just relentlessly good and relentlessly charming.” “Just one of the best around.” “He gets to the bottom of extremely complicated cases so quickly. He’s approachable, friendly and good with clients – such an amenable man.” (2021)

  Edward Cumming QC has a broad chancery practice which includes heavyweight commercial cases, in addition to complex trusts matters. He is described as “both delightful and brilliant – just relentlessly good and relentlessly charming.” Another market insider says that “he’s just one of the best around,” adding: “He gets to the bottom of extremely complicated cases so quickly. He’s approachable, friendly and good with clients, such an amenable man. He’s excellent.” (2020 – High Net Worth)

  Offshore

  Chambers & Partners

  Edward Cumming QC is highly regarded among peers for his excellent advocacy skills. He frequently appears in trust, company and general commercial litigation. He has a substantial offshore practice and appears in Singapore, South Africa and Mauritius, alongside more traditional jurisdictions in the Caribbean and Channel Islands. Cumming is instructed on behalf of multinational corporates in addition to high net worth private clients. Strengths: “He is a go-to contact. He has a very modern approach and he is full of energy.” “He has energy as well as bright, strategic thinking and is a delight to work with.” (2022 – UK and Global)

  Strengths: “Super helpful, keen to assist and technically brilliant.” “Very good at mastering the facts at the law.” “Incredibly able and pleasant to deal with.” (2021 – UK and Global)

  Legal 500

  ‘His knowledge of the law is phenomenal but what sets him apart is his willingness to roll up his sleeves and help in all aspects of the litigation.’ (2022)

  ‘The perfect modern barrister.’ (2021)

  Commercial Dispute Resolution

  Chambers & Partners

  “A phenomenal lawyer, who is one of the set’s rising stars.” (2022 – UK and Global)

  “Very easy to work with, very responsive, very pragmatic and very committed.” “He gets to grips with things easily, is tenacious and really fights your corner.” (2021 – UK and Global)

  Legal 500

  ‘He is fantastic at absorbing and analysing complex information quickly, and can formulate very sound advice at an impressive speed.’ (2022)

  Banking & Finance

  Chambers & Partners

  Edward Cumming QC is regularly called upon by banks and other financial institutions to advise on a wide range of financial matters. He advises clients on all manner of cases, including those involving complex derivatives and matters with elements of fraud. Strengths: “He is the person you want on speed dial. He is super quick, really bright and very good to work with. He brings his sharp analysis to any problem you present. He is not afraid of rolling his sleeves up and he is always sensitive to the client’s commercial needs.” (2022)

  Legal 500

  ‘Absolutely superb – he is particularly strong in the banking field and is excellent for the claimant side.’ (2022)

  Art and Cultural Property Law

  Chambers & Partners

  Edward Cumming QC of XXIV Old Buildings is well known for his significant chancery work and is also instructed in major art cases. “He is fantastic. Whenever you get him you get top quality. He has an amazing brain,” states a solicitor, adding: “He is my favourite barrister. He’s great with the law and is commercial. He gets things naturally.” A fellow barrister says: “He is seriously impressive. He is just phenomenally bright. His written work is mind-blowingly brilliant and he’s absolutely phenomenal. He’s articulate and a powerhouse advocate.” (2022 – High Net Worth)

  Silk with a broad practice encompassing traditional chancery and commercial litigation. He is often instructed in disputes between major auction houses, vendors and purchasers (or potential purchasers) concerning provenance and the true ownership of important pieces of art. Strengths: “A superb litigator, who has a brilliant mind and provides quick commercial advice.” (2022)

  Private Client: Trusts & Probate

  Legal 500

  ‘Edward is that rare thing amongst Chancery barristers in that he is not only extremely bright but also extremely client friendly. He is able to deal with complex contentious problems, whether trust or commercial, and distil them in an accessible way for clients. Solicitors have him on direct dial.’ (2022)

  ‘Humour, hard work, stamina and a very large brain – nothing phases him.’ (2021)

  Insolvency

  Legal 500

  ‘Very bright and quick and clients like him.’ (2022)

  ‘Very insightful and gets to the point quickly.’ (2021)

  Private Client

  Who’s Who Legal

  Edward Cumming QC stands out for his “incredibly intelligent and enthusiastic approach to complex private client disputes”. (2022)

  Chambers & Partners (2019) ranked Edward (exceptionally for one of his call) for six separate specialisms – recommending him as a ‘New Silk’  for both traditional and commercial chancery and offshore disputes as well as in commercial litigation, company litigation and aviation disputes.  Chambers & Partners has bestowed on him a range of plaudits.

  Solicitors say he is a “skilled drafter and a stellar advocate.  His star is in the ascent”.  He is  “a formidable opponent, who is masterful in designing strategies to maximise returns“.  He is “unbelievably hardworking and responsive, one of the best…” and “clients adore working with him; he fights to the bitter end and his thoroughness is first class“.

  Edward is a “good, bold advocate, who fights for his clients very well and is emotionally intelligent”, and “praised by commentators for his ethical integrity [and] intelligence” and said to be “refreshingly robust in his advice and very good on his feet.” “Extremely hard-working and diligent, he’s a very fine tactician.”

  “He’s got tremendous legal knowledge and he’s dedicated, has a great work ethic and is a great team player.”

  “Quick, calm, thorough, responsive; he’s a pleasure to deal with.”

  “Approachable, down-to-earth and measured in conference; he’s extremely user-friendly. He’s also good at drafting.”

  Chambers High Net Worth (2020) ranks him for traditional chancery work, saying “he’s just one of the best around… He gets to the bottom of extremely complicated cases so quickly. He’s approachable, friendly and good with clients, such an amenable man. He’s excellent.”

  Chambers Global (2018) also recommends him as “extremely hard-working and diligent, and a fine tactician“.

  Edward is ranked as a leading junior in eight separate categories in Legal 500 (2018). His chancery expertise is recognised by his recommendation for private client: trusts & probate, company & partnership, insolvency, and offshore work. His commercial expertise is recognised by his recommendation for commercial litigation, civil fraud, aviation, and banking & finance.

  Legal 500 (2017) describes him as “a stellar advocate“, “a formidable opponent“, and “masterful in designing strategies“.

  Legal 500 has also viewed him as “[a] human dynamo – always available for a call and ready to assist“, “very user-friendly” and “[a]superb junior and great team player who combines intellect with great enthusiasm“.

  The publication – which has recommended him since 2010 as a “rising star” – also says that he is “[t]echnically gifted, very approachable and always willing to go the extra mile” and “responsive and knowledgeable, he is excellent with clients and his quality of work is exceptional“. Previous editions have described him as ‘a true star at the mid-junior level, who stands out from the crowd‘, ‘a sharp advocate and extremely intelligent’ and someone who ‘empathises with the client on both a commercial and personal level.’

  Edward has been recommended for both insolvency and private client disputes in Who’s Who Legal since 2014 and as a prominent barrister dealing with contentious trusts in Citywealth Leaders List since 2012. His client feedback is that “Edward Cumming is undoubtedly amongst the most able juniors of his call that I have come across. He has a quick and agile mind and combines exceptional analytical skills with interpersonal skills of equal calibre. I have absolutely no doubt that he has a stellar career in front of him and I think it very much on the cards that he will come to be seen as a market leader in private wealth litigation.”

• Academic history
  • MA (Cantab)
  • LLM (UPenn)
  • Thouron Fellowship to the University of Pennsylvania
  • Queen Mother’s Scholar and Harmsworth Exhibitioner of Middle Temple
• Languages

  French and (basic) German

• Professional memberships
  • Chancery Bar Association
  • Commercial Bar Association
  • Institute of Art & Law
  • Guernsey International Lawyers Association
  • Bar Pro Bono Unit
• Publications
  • Co-General Editor of International Trust Laws (Jordans, loose-leaf)
  • Regular expert contributor to Tolley’s Insolvency Law
  • ‘Officeholders’ remuneration: a cautionary tale’, Recovery magazine, Autumn 2009
  • ‘Insolvency issues for trusts and estates practitioners‘, 23 Insolvency Intelligence (2010) 33
  • ‘Netting Assets‘, Solicitors Journal (2010) Vol. 154, No. 33, Supp. 21-22
• Lectures and seminars

  Edward is regularly asked to deliver lectures and also organises seminars and workshops (further details of these events and Edward’s availability can be obtained from the practice management team by email to clerks@xxiv.co.uk).

Save as PDF